Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1221

reference
534-tree-1
name
1221
tree-preservation-order

undefined

534-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.023954 50.884362)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.023840 50.884350,-1.023845 50.884372,-1.023861 50.884393,-1.023886 50.884409,-1.023917 50.884419,-1.023952 50.884423,-1.023988 50.884420,-1.024019 50.884410,-1.024045 50.884394,-1.024062 50.884374,-1.024068 50.884352,-1.024062 50.884330,-1.024047 50.884310,-1.024022 50.884293,-1.023990 50.884283,-1.023955 50.884279,-1.023920 50.884282,-1.023888 50.884292,-1.023863 50.884308,-1.023846 50.884328,-1.023840 50.884350)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL